tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1999118035210794416.post289508612717633690..comments2021-11-10T21:19:19.842+13:00Comments on PatentBuff: Productivity and PatentsPatentBuffhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02740740331905014250noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1999118035210794416.post-17458831178920767292012-12-22T08:36:57.731+13:002012-12-22T08:36:57.731+13:00Thanks Mark. I agree with you that this proposal d...Thanks Mark. I agree with you that this proposal does look like it will discriminate against Australian resident inventors.<br /><br />An unintended but foreseeable consequence of this proposal may be that Australian resident inventors make their first filing in New Zealand rather than Australia. One way of encouraging stronger relations I guess!<br /><br />Have a great break. 2013 is looking PatentBuffhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02740740331905014250noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1999118035210794416.post-48456474889947229892012-12-19T11:10:23.303+13:002012-12-19T11:10:23.303+13:00Thanks for this post, Matt.
Interesting note on I...Thanks for this post, Matt.<br /><br />Interesting note on IP Australia's new extortion - whoops, I mean 'examination' - fees: under the practice that is currently being proposed, it would not even be necessary to file a New Zealand complete application and obtain a search. Any Australian application claiming foreign priority would avoid the 'preliminary search and opinion' (Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06157794228297387928noreply@blogger.com