tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1999118035210794416.post6362782882921823171..comments2021-11-10T21:19:19.842+13:00Comments on PatentBuff: Cybersource Corporation v Retail Decisions – a beautiful mindPatentBuffhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02740740331905014250noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1999118035210794416.post-64654906958222981062011-09-07T23:20:26.823+12:002011-09-07T23:20:26.823+12:00an extremely beautiful mindan extremely beautiful mindAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1999118035210794416.post-22649085289162763212011-08-24T18:34:58.503+12:002011-08-24T18:34:58.503+12:00Hi Matt,
In Europe, it seems they have answered t...Hi Matt,<br /><br />In Europe, it seems they have answered to your last question : whether a beautiful mind or an ordinary mind, if you don't use any technical means, the claimed subject-matter is not patentable under Art.52(2) & (3) EPC : "it is doubtful as a matter of principle whether complexity can be used to disqualify an activity as a mental activity".<br />see decision Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com